LondonCityGirl
LondonCityGirl
  • 94
  • 18 952 979
HOW POWERFUL IS RUSSIA? || RUSSIAN GEOPOLITICS EXPLAINED SIMPLY
This video provides a simple overview of present day Russia’s geopolitical strategy and objectives. We explore what Russia wants and what has led to the country’s current conflicts, rivalries and partnerships around the world.
TIMESTAMPS:
Introduction - 00:00
Vladimir Putin - 01:17
Russian identity - 01:50
Russia & its neighbours - 02:18
Russia & Ukraine - 03:13
Russia vs The West - 04:31
Russia & China - 05:41
Russia & the Middle East - 07:26
Russia's disinformation campaigns - 08:22
Russia & Africa - 09:05
Переглядів: 930

Відео

HISTORY OF RUSSIA
Переглядів 9763 місяці тому
#russia #history TIMESTAMPS: Origins - 00:01 Kievan Rus - 00:19 Mongol rule / Mongol yoke - 00:46 Ivan the Terrible - 01:02 Romanov dynasty - 01:34 Serfdom - 01:46 Peter the Great - 02:10 Catherine the Great - 03:20 Emancipation of the serfs - 04:11 World War I - 04:57 Russian revolution - 5:02 Soviet era - 05:38 World War II - 06:00 Cold War - 06:24 Collapse of the Soviet Union - 06:56 Present...
WATERGATE explained simply
Переглядів 2 тис.6 місяців тому
In this video we explain what happened in the Watergate scandal which led to American President, Richard Nixon, resigning from office. The Watergate scandal remains a key moment in US political history and is still referenced to this day as scandals are often affixed with the term ‘gate’ in media reporting, in order to convey how serious the bad behaviour is.
ARRIVAL (2016) EXPLAINED & ANALYSED
Переглядів 3,8 тис.10 місяців тому
Arrival describes human’s first contact with aliens and examines concepts such as the nature of time, the complexity of language and determinism. In this video we take a deep dive into the film which takes an intelligent look as to what our species’ reaction to aliens might be. TIMESTAMPS: Introduction - 0:00 First contact - 1:11 The complexity of language - 2:12 The appearance of the Heptapods...
Geopolitics: What is The West?
Переглядів 1,5 тис.11 місяців тому
In this video we look at what the concept of ‘the West’ means when it comes to geopolitics. It is a group of countries that include the United States, Canada, and the countries of Western Europe. This collection of countries share certain political, economic, and cultural characteristics. Other videos you may enjoy: * Capitalism, socialism & communism explained simply - ua-cam.com/video/53vmQNV...
What is Feminism? || Feminism explained simply
Переглядів 33 тис.Рік тому
In this video we explore feminism; a social and political movement that advocates for the equality of the sexes, the recognition of women's rights and the empowerment of women. We look at the history of feminism and offer a brief overview of first-wave feminism, second-wave feminism, third-wave feminism and modern feminism.
TENET (2020) STALSK 12 BATTLE EXPLAINED || Illustrated breakdown
Переглядів 6 тис.Рік тому
A lot happens during the Stalsk-12 battle scene as we follow both the forward moving Red team and the reverted Blue team as they move through time in opposite directions. In this video we breakdown exactly what happens, with an illustrated timeline, from the perspective of both forward and backward moving characters.
What is Fascism?
Переглядів 7 тис.Рік тому
In this video we explain what fascism is; a political ideology that emphasises nationalism and authoritarianism. Fascism rose to prominence in the early 20th century, with the rise of fascist regimes in Italy under Benito Mussolini and in Germany under Adolf Hitler. After World War II, fascism declined in popularity, but it has continued to exist in various forms around the world.
FUN FACT ABOUT EVERY COUNTRY IN EUROPE
Переглядів 854Рік тому
TIMESTAMPS: Intro - 0:00 Albania - 0:27 Andorra - 0:36 Armenia - 0:49 Austria - 1:01 Belarus - 1:18 Belgium - 1:33 Bosnia and Herzegovina - 1:49 Bulgaria - 2:05 Croatia - 2:16 Cyprus - 2:26 Czech Republic - 2:41 Denmark - 2:51 Estonia - 3:03 Finland - 3:13 France - 3:24 Georgia - 3:34 Germany - 3:43 Greece - 3:53 Hungary - 4:00 Iceland - 4:07 Ireland - 4:26 Italy - 4:43 Latvia - 5:02 Liechtenst...
TENET (2020) OSLO FREEPORT SCENE EXPLAINED || Illustrated breakdown
Переглядів 3,7 тис.Рік тому
The freeport scene in Christopher Nolan’s Tenet (2020) is the first time we see inversion in action with an inverted protagonist who fights with his past self. In this video we breakdown exactly what happens, with an illustrated timeline, from the perspective of both forward and backward moving characters. TENET explanation video playlist: bit.ly/41mXJBW
Bitcoin, cryptocurrency and NFTs explained simply || Can Crypto make you rich?
Переглядів 912Рік тому
In this video I breakdown the basics of cryptocurrency. I explain the technical jargon in simple terms and we examine whether cryptocurrency can make you rich & whether cryptocurrency is the future of money. TIMESTAMPS: What is cryptocurrency? - 00:00 How does cryptocurrency work? - 00:18 What is a blockchain? - 01:02 Coins vs Tokens - 01:32 The advantages of cryptocurrency - 01:48 The disadvan...
TENET (2020) TALLINN CAR CHASE EXPLAINED || Illustrated breakdown
Переглядів 14 тис.Рік тому
The car chase scene in Christopher Nolan’s Tenet (2020) is the first time in the film we see people going forwards and backwards through a period of time. In this video we breakdown exactly what happens, with an illustrated timeline, from the perspective of both forward and backward moving characters. TENET explanation videos playlist: bit.ly/41mXJBW
FUN FACT ABOUT EVERY COUNTRY IN NORTH AMERICA || Mexico City is sinking!
Переглядів 736Рік тому
TIMESTAMPS: Intro - 0:00 Antigua and Barbuda - 0:09 The Bahamas - 0:25 Barbados - 0:40 Belize - 0;57 Canada - 1:12 Costa Rica - 1:27 Cuba - 1:44 Dominica - 1:56 Dominican Republic - 2:13 El Salvador - 2:29 Grenada - 2:37 Guatemala - 2:48 Haiti - 2:59 Honduras - 3:12 Jamaica - 3:27 Mexico - 3:36 Nicaragua - 3:54 Panama - 4:04 Saint Kitts and Nevis - 4:10 Saint Lucia - 4:28 Saint Vincent and the ...
What happened to MH370? || The plane that vanished
Переглядів 3,5 тис.Рік тому
What happened to MH370? || The plane that vanished
TENET (2020) ILLUSTRATED TIMELINE & EXPLANATION
Переглядів 60 тис.Рік тому
TENET (2020) ILLUSTRATED TIMELINE & EXPLANATION
LEARN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD (WITH FLAGS) IN UNDER THAN 10 MINS
Переглядів 1,2 тис.Рік тому
LEARN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD (WITH FLAGS) IN UNDER THAN 10 MINS
INTERSTELLAR (2014) EXPLAINED || Science & ending of Interstellar explained
Переглядів 4,1 тис.Рік тому
INTERSTELLAR (2014) EXPLAINED || Science & ending of Interstellar explained
HISTORY OF THE WORLD IN 30 MINS
Переглядів 11 тис.2 роки тому
HISTORY OF THE WORLD IN 30 MINS
BLACK MIRROR'S PLAYTEST - EXPLAINED & ANALYSED
Переглядів 36 тис.4 роки тому
BLACK MIRROR'S PLAYTEST - EXPLAINED & ANALYSED
BLACK MIRROR'S NOSEDIVE - EXPLAINED & ANALYSED
Переглядів 60 тис.4 роки тому
BLACK MIRROR'S NOSEDIVE - EXPLAINED & ANALYSED
BLACK MIRROR'S THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF YOU - EXPLAINED & ANALYSED
Переглядів 17 тис.4 роки тому
BLACK MIRROR'S THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF YOU - EXPLAINED & ANALYSED
BLACK MIRROR'S FIFTEEN MILLION MERITS - EXPLAINED & ANALYSED
Переглядів 25 тис.4 роки тому
BLACK MIRROR'S FIFTEEN MILLION MERITS - EXPLAINED & ANALYSED
Middle East geopolitics explained simply || The Middle East explained in a nutshell
Переглядів 394 тис.4 роки тому
Middle East geopolitics explained simply || The Middle East explained in a nutshell
DARK MATTER & DARK ENERGY EXPLAINED SIMPLY
Переглядів 22 тис.4 роки тому
DARK MATTER & DARK ENERGY EXPLAINED SIMPLY
WORLD WAR 1 EXPLAINED SIMPLY - what the heck happened?
Переглядів 27 тис.4 роки тому
WORLD WAR 1 EXPLAINED SIMPLY - what the heck happened?
IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE?
Переглядів 13 тис.4 роки тому
IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE?
BLACK HOLES EXPLAINED SIMPLY
Переглядів 15 тис.5 років тому
BLACK HOLES EXPLAINED SIMPLY
TRIANGLE (2009) - ILLUSTRATED EXPLANATION
Переглядів 64 тис.5 років тому
TRIANGLE (2009) - ILLUSTRATED EXPLANATION
WHY WE CRAVE A LIFE WE CAN’T AFFORD? || KEEPING UP WITH THE KARDASHIANS
Переглядів 3,2 тис.5 років тому
WHY WE CRAVE A LIFE WE CAN’T AFFORD? || KEEPING UP WITH THE KARDASHIANS
CHINESE POLITICS EXPLAINED SIMPLY || WHY IS CHINA IMPORTANT?
Переглядів 210 тис.5 років тому
CHINESE POLITICS EXPLAINED SIMPLY || WHY IS CHINA IMPORTANT?

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @stevekasan3105
    @stevekasan3105 Годину тому

    Bravo you nailed it perfectly.

  • @denisthomas7013
    @denisthomas7013 День тому

    EVERYONE who has accepted the theory of special relativity as truth has been deceived. With special relativity comes the twin paradox and the clock paradox. By definition paradox means contrary to common sense. If you use your common sense, you will reject special and general relativity. With conventional relativity you learn that if feelings of acceleration are ignored, the moving observer can consider himself/herself as the one who is stationary. In each example used by those teaching special relativity, both the stationary and moving observer reach the exact same conclusion about the other. The imaginary light clock, which is the primary example used to deceive students of relativity, is comprised of two horizontal mirrors with a ball of light bouncing between the mirrors. There are numerous errors made with this example. When illustrated in motion, the clock is traveling along the X-axis, the ball of light on the Y-axis, and the stationary observer on the Z-axis. Special relativity only deals with inertial velocities. The light clock cannot be in inertial velocity with respect to the Z-axis. If the stationary observer is on the X-axis, then the hypotenuse illustrated cannot be observed. Observational time delay is ignored. Einstein's second postulate was that light is independent of the source. Although that is true, Einstein apparently did not understand that. It means as the light clock moved, the mirrors would move out of the path of the light and the imaginary clock would stop working. The only way the ball of light could move forward with the mirrors is if the light would gain kinetic energy upon acceleration, but it doesn't. Einstein's moving elevator thought experiment, which he thought of in 1907 and which became the basis for his belief that gravity bends light, not only proves the light clock to be wrong but also reveals his confusion, proving gravity does not bend light. With the elevator "experiment", the elevator has a hole in the wall and rises quickly as it passes by a horizontal beam of light. As the small amount of light which entered through the hole continues on its horizontal path, the motion of the elevator causes the light to hit the opposing wall at a lower elevation. If the elevator was accelerating at the time, the path would be a parabolic arc. If it was in constant motion, the path plotted would be a straight diagonal to the opposing wall. Now imagine the imaginary light clock. It is impossible to make the light hit the mirrors while in motion without tilting the mirrors. But if you do that, then your clock would not be identical to that of the stationary observer's clock. Lorentz also made this error concerning light and he came up with what is referred to as the Lorentz equation: ⋎ = 1/(√1-v2/c2). Einstein based his theory on this erroneous equation. Replacing the imaginary light clock with imaginary radio equipment also disproves special and general relativity. This example also reveals that the Doppler formula students will be taught is incorrect. Alice and Bob are astronauts on two separate spacecraft docked together in space. Beside each is a radio transmitter which emits a modulated pulse each second and which transmits at 1 GHz. Also beside each astronaut are two receivers equipped with pulse counters. AA & AB beside Alice and BA & BB beside Bob. AA & BB are connected to shielded antennas which can only receive the signal from the adjacent transmitter, while AB & BA can only receive the signal from the other spacecraft. All four counters are synchronized and read 3,600 seconds (01:00:00 AM) when Alice departs along a straight axis from Bob at an instantaneous velocity of 0.8c for 3,600 seconds and instantly stops. The Doppler formulas you were likely taught are incorrect, and have been corrected in my paper, Correcting the Doppler Formula.(eiris.it/ojs/index.php/scienceandphilosophy/article/view/1196) The formulas in the physics texts produce a different result when it is the observer moving compared to when it is the source moving, although the rate of separation is the same. The corrected formula as published is: fd=fs (1+vrel),vrel>0 when approaching. The velocity of the waves, whether sound or light, is represented as 1, and the relative velocity is a fraction of 1. fd = frequency detected; fs = frequency of source. However, even this formula was not quite right, with the following correction necessary: fd = fw (1 + vrel), vrel < 0 when receding & vrel > 0 if the velocity of the source is less than the velocity of the waves. This change is in recognition that when the source is approaching faster than the velocity of the waves, the frequency detected would not be detected until after the source has past and is receding. The receivers AA and BB did not observe a frequency shift, because the transmitters they were monitoring are adjacent. Therefore, counters/clocks AA & BB now display 7,200. (2:00:00 AM). Using the corrected Doppler formula to determine the frequency observed by receivers AB & BA: fd=1 GHz (1-0.8)=200 MHz. One modulated pulse is transmitted per billion electromagnetic waves. If you use the corrected Doppler formula you recognize the counters AB and BA advance once per five seconds: (1 GHz)/(200 MHz)=5. Since Alice traveled for 3,600 seconds, clocks AB and BA received 3,600/5=720 pulses and therefore display 3,600 (starting time) + 720 = 4,320 seconds or 01:12:00 AM. If you used the relativistic Doppler formula, which was modified because of SR & GR, the answer would be 01:20:00, while If you used the original Doppler formula you discover a difference in the clocks AB and BA. Clock AB would display 3,600+ 3,600/5=4,320 or 01:12:00 AM while clock BA would display 3,600+ 3,600/1.8 = 5,600 or 01:33:20 AM. This is not the result of time dilation, but an error in the formula. Some people think radar proves the relativistic Doppler formula to be correct, but it does not. The velocities with which radar is concerned are so miniscule compared to the velocity of light that an approximate answer is close enough. It should be recognized that astronomers who use either the original or relativistic Doppler formula to make velocity calculations based upon redshift make gross errors! There are other factors which prohibit the reliability of redshift. Hubble must have learned what was discovered in 1895, so that he recanted in 1947 with the remark: “redshifts may not be due to an expanding universe”. Many people will ignore this remark by Hubble because it does not fit the narrative that Genesis is wrong. Regardless of direction or velocity Alice or Bob travel, the clocks will not again synchronize until the spacecraft dock together again. With special relativity comes the claim that it is the clock that determines the time, however that thought was disproven by C.S. Lewis in Mere Christianity. A clock, a ruler, a pressure gauge, a teaspoon, a thermometer, a volt-ohm meter, an anemometer, a torque wrench, and a scale have one thing in common: they are instruments which are used to measure a quantity. It is not the instrument that determines the standard, and just as with what Lewis stated about comparisons of morality, “the standard that measures two things is something different from either.” Quality instruments can offer more precise measurements, but again, it is not the instrument that determines the standard. The proponents of SR & GR teach it is the clock that determines the time and then want you to compare imaginary clocks. After the definition of the system international, SI, second was changed in 1967 to correspond to oscillations of cesium, scientists recognized that elevated atomic clocks ticked faster than those at sea level. Some even claimed that time would be different, such as with the CSI quote. Again, common sense should be enough to reject such a claim. Gravity affects the resonant frequency of all isotopes, including those in atomic clocks. While the clock at the top of the tall building ticks faster than the one at the bottom, noon occurs for both at the same instant, so how could it be a different time? (Get someone who believes in SR & GR to answer that.) Recognizing elevated atomic clocks ticked faster, the IAU, International Astronomical Union, recommended the definition of the SI second be modified that it is the atomic second at sea level, effective 1977, thus, elevated and moving atomic clocks, such as in GPS satellites, would not be counting SI seconds if the sea level definition is used as the standard for the second, and would therefore accrue instrument error. Some have made the claims that "clocks at the top of tall buildings, where gravity is slightly less, run slightly faster than those at the bottom, just as predicted by the equations of general relativity (GR).” They want you to believe that time is different, but it is not. Noon occurs for the observer at the top of the building at the same instant as it does for the one at the base of the building. Don’t be deceived by claims made in support of special or general relativity. If you cannot show time dilation with this example of radio equipment replacing the light clock, or show how the imaginary light clock could function while in motion, or explain why the clock determines the time/ sets the standard, you have no basis in truth to accept special or general relativity, or any of the claims made in support of SR & GR. The question by Louis Essen, the inventor of the atomic clock, still rings true today “Why have scientists accepted a theory which contains obvious errors and lacks any genuine experimental support?”

  • @jackpot1359
    @jackpot1359 День тому

    What is feminism? Nothing good

  • @anas.t.o.5733
    @anas.t.o.5733 2 дні тому

    Now it's soo Clear thanku

  • @KimJong-h8u
    @KimJong-h8u 3 дні тому

    Your voice like ai = I love god 👋🫂❤️🇮🇳🤗

  • @musthavechannel5262
    @musthavechannel5262 3 дні тому

    Nolan went full retard on this one.

  • @gintongaparador999
    @gintongaparador999 3 дні тому

    Something dark exists out there and I believe they are entities. They are what rule the world, feeding on humans emotions. Christians would call them devils. These things are beyong what our physical eyes can see, but there are few people who can see spirits and entities. I would say people who are diagnosed with mental illnesses are able to see these things.

  • @F-Sine
    @F-Sine 3 дні тому

    Out of all of the time travel TV shows and movies this is hands down the simplest and best movie. I love Dr. Who and several other movies and TV shows but this is my top favorite. I don't understand why it's so difficult for most people to understand time travel movies. It must be the multiple times lines, erased time lines, creation of new or alternate time lines, etc. I've watched this movie so many times since it first came out in block buster when I was young before the digital age when we had to hunt for good things to watch. I bought a DVD copy later when I found a used copy of it that I've already watched 3 times.

  • @Fizanfungamez
    @Fizanfungamez 4 дні тому

    Bruh illuminati is a i dian song

  • @BojanBojovic
    @BojanBojovic 5 днів тому

    Thanks. The film would be much better if made to be understood by humans. This attempt to make it special specifically is not good at all. No one said the movie must be incomprehensible complex to be good. Just the opposite.

  • @ubuntuawakening4577
    @ubuntuawakening4577 5 днів тому

    I'm sorry but I must be against the colonial expansion of Israel backed by the US. Israel was always in the wrong given that they inserted themselves in that region in the first place

  • @buckholdings9299
    @buckholdings9299 5 днів тому

    Well according to this my mare shouldn't be domesticated eitherb😂😂

  • @Postulatedstate
    @Postulatedstate 6 днів тому

    Women are not supposed to have power

  • @ChubbyChecker182
    @ChubbyChecker182 6 днів тому

    Indie Tenet

  • @yousufkhan998
    @yousufkhan998 7 днів тому

    Your explanation is just wow I got a lot of clarity from watching..

  • @Youbeentagged
    @Youbeentagged 8 днів тому

    And Nolan thought Tenet will be confusing to us.

  • @quipis
    @quipis 8 днів тому

    Wow, you really unraveled it for me! I had been postponing watching this film for years, knowing that it would be very difficult to understand, and it indeed was! I was so confused that today I started searching for explanations, and you did a great job with your graphics! Thanks a lot. Now I have to watch it again with all the knowledge you gave me. Thank you!!

  • @lesterdelacruz5088
    @lesterdelacruz5088 8 днів тому

    What I took from it is the role of predestination and free will. We cannot see the future so we play the game of life behaving and making choices. Only to find that those choices couldn’t have been any other choice. So predestination is inescapable. It’s a lesson on the journey towards self acceptance. Accepting the path unique to your experience. Because it couldn’t have been any other.

  • @Trigonometry_Police
    @Trigonometry_Police 8 днів тому

    *Secret Confusion in Spirituality* “The Destructive Aspect of Wit and Wordplay” O! To speak out loud, the most heinous and most horrible verses! That God, Himself, would run for cover. It is mankind’s ability to measure and reason that separates it from the animals. This is expressed by its languages. A lesser person becomes confused by the measurements and expressions of a greater one, and that confusion is their triumph in battle. The greatest a person can measure and express is the grasp of a higher power because this means they are aware of the next level of their triumph. For many this is an expression of God or the spiritual or the Celestial. A person of scientific reasoning begs ultimately to the philosopher, he discovers Aristotle, Archimedes, and Pythagoras at the inception of their journey, and caters to the engineer who is only worried about the basic necessities of the observable world. Physics is a little smarter but draws its inspiration from science fiction writers mostly such as with black holes. However, these men carried with them a grasp of a higher possibility. Therefore, some may not have yet developed a grasp of a higher possibility. Others are followers and grasp a higher power only because it exists in the observable truth of the world, but would ultimately lose that grasp if it were to disappear from common sight. A greater person measures a greater thing and that expression becomes enduring. Their expressions are also dangerous to the layman because that is their triumph. The highest of all measurements are Celestial Beings (who aligned the planets and starts) and the consciousness of stars and matter, or the Celestial birth of the spirit that gave its DNA unto mankind over billions of years and split the matter of male and female into separate parts. This makes the proprietors of the Occult and Esoteric principles the highest of all authority on Earth and many have paid the price for the dangers of their expressions. Unfortunately, nobody in their right mind would want notoriety or a position of authority, especially because of the annoying aspects of presentation and formality involved and the constant watchful eye of a dangerous and ignorant public. It is here that the Devil becomes like a hero for truths about repression though many still go off like a bomb. WARNING: Confusion caused by wit and wordplay may cause perverse animal-like sexual perversity and violence in others. Perhaps, this is your true calling? "Hey, Jude. Don't be afraid..." -The Beatles -Horus V. Wilbourne I know one thing living in America. SCAM.

  • @Gsv-w2q
    @Gsv-w2q 9 днів тому

    “His and her life” 0:17

  • @bakedveal2624
    @bakedveal2624 9 днів тому

    idc, this is Female Fight Club. No arguments will be heard.

  • @Rust_Cohle_Solos
    @Rust_Cohle_Solos 9 днів тому

    One of my favourite movies recently.

  • @stewiesaidthat
    @stewiesaidthat 10 днів тому

    Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. E=mc. Mass is acceleration with a velocity < c so E=c where c is absolute acceleration so E=a or Everything is an emergent property of ACCELERATION. F=ma. Its mass TIMES Acceleration equals F so its F=a or Acceleration equals Acceleration Mass alone does not create acceleration/force. Mass is not the actionable force. There is no mass attraction. Einstein’s relativity is mathematical nonsense as its based on Newton's gravitational attraction nonsense which was disproven by Galileo with his ball drop experiments at the Tower of Pisa. Galileo also theorized that it was the Earth's motion in space that created the tides. Using Newton's and Kepler's laws of Motion, the tides are the result of the earth rotating on its axis as it orbits the sun. Mercury's eccentric orbit is a result of its mass distribution anomalies. Nasa's GRACE project shows that the earth picks up a wobble as the desert region along the equater goes from dry to wet. The exfra acceleration (Kepler's Law of Motion) causes Mercury's orbit to change. On Earth, the extra acceleration goes into the annual tidal bulge on the opposite side of the sun where the most acceleration is occurring. To date, not a single experiment has validated Einstein’s Relativity. In fact, the experiments that have been conducted so far actually disprove Einstein’s relativity. The synchronized clock experiments. Both clocks used the same amount of energy. Space and Time are separate frames of reference. Clocks are instruments that measure motion in space, not time, as the clock's cesium-133 atom is chilled to absolute zero while the observer's atoms are at room/body temperature. Spacetime? Wrong. Its Space and Time. Mass =Actionable Force? Wrong. Acceleration is the actionable force. Relativity? Wrong. Motion is absolute. E=mc. Everything is an Emergent property of Acceleration. Including mass. The laws of physics are equally applicable in All frames of reference. That invalidates separate relativity laws. The orientation of the frame, vertical, horizontal, 1d, 2d, 3d, rotating, space, time, should not result in different laws for each frame. Gravity is depicted as a vertical drop. What happens when the frame is turned 90 degrees? Light travels in its own frame of reference, independent of its source. What's happens when you accelerate the source's frame but not the photon's frame? The laws of physics are equally applicable in All frames of reference, including the photon's frame. Applying Newton's law of motion, F=ma and the inverse square law of motion, we can see that as the distance the photon has to travel, its force decreases, resulting in fewer clock cycles. Now, why was that so hard for Einstein to understand when it was he himself that said 1) Motion is absolute as nothing can go faster than light. 2) Light travels in its own frame of reference, independent of its source 3) the speed of light is constant 4) its the same for all observers. How does somebody get relativity? Time-dilation? Mass as an actionable Force? Spacetime? And all that other relativity nonsense out of what he himself said was the real universe? But more importantly. Why did the entire scientific community follow him down his rabbit hole into an alternate universe that is a mirror image of the real universe. That's why Nicholas Tesla was right about Einstein and the fools that believed in his nonsense. Relativity = Religion = Flat Earth universe. Any questions? Ask your nearest preacher. Why are there multiple relativity theories if the laws of physics are equally applicable in ALL frames of reference? If more mass (salt) is added to water, does the temperature (acceleration factor) increase? If Newton's apple tree is turned 90 degrees to the horizontal, is it still mass attraction when two cars on the highway collide when the lead car slows down?

  • @DeepakKashyap-oz9xj
    @DeepakKashyap-oz9xj 10 днів тому

    you said 7 minutes so why 30 seconds extra ?

  • @Atulya101ASTP3
    @Atulya101ASTP3 10 днів тому

    14:23 Why and how was she uninjured & 14:23 How did she forget everything & 14:28 if she is dead and is not moving on to the after life, so as a ghost how everyone is able to see her AND just one last thing is, if she keeps forgetting everything then how will she feel being traped for eternity, everytime would be new for her.

  • @VoldoronGaming
    @VoldoronGaming 12 днів тому

    One of my favorite files of all time. It’s a Los Angeles story and unless you have lived in Los Angeles you can never fully understand the story. If fact I saw this film for the first time while living in Los Angeles.

  • @DTFMUSICTUPANDE
    @DTFMUSICTUPANDE 12 днів тому

    I would like to join

  • @Plancton5000
    @Plancton5000 13 днів тому

    What’s in the box!!!

  • @latoya1274
    @latoya1274 13 днів тому

    Short and simple. Thank you ❤

  • @Loreenatv
    @Loreenatv 13 днів тому

    This needs to be nr. 1 on the search. FoundFlix is ALWAYS the top result for movies explained when all he ever does is just recap. It's so unfair cause there are high effort gems like this buried 10 vids down where most people won't bother to scroll

  • @fermataselin
    @fermataselin 13 днів тому

    Now I see where the inspiration for Silent Hill 2 came from. 😅

  • @kenvikta6992
    @kenvikta6992 13 днів тому

    This is the first time a movie watched me

  • @nuna_tm
    @nuna_tm 14 днів тому

    When John calls the barkeep a son of a b*tch and the barkeep replied ‘isn’t that funny’ 💀✨

  • @weedys6264
    @weedys6264 16 днів тому

    What if Roberta Sparrow was actually a Manipulated Dead like Gretchen and Gretchen will have a similar fate

  • @isikoderick7177
    @isikoderick7177 16 днів тому

    I need to join you

  • @jameshoops10
    @jameshoops10 16 днів тому

    glad to see you back

  • @blas5i
    @blas5i 16 днів тому

    LCG is the greatest - I have seen SO many explanations - this is the top - 100% quality as always - even here in 2024

  • @josevictoriano6388
    @josevictoriano6388 18 днів тому

    So Abe 5 and Abe 0 are in the same time line then?? What happens with those 2 🤨🤔

  • @nadeemmukhtar642
    @nadeemmukhtar642 19 днів тому

    I am confused. I understand the movies the person fellling in love with his own past and gave birth to his own self and going back and forth to bomber ( himself) Etc etc.. my question is when and where did John/Jane come into existence before starting this circle???

  • @snowhusk
    @snowhusk 20 днів тому

    Girl, you're a treasure for doing all of this💜 thank you!!

  • @patricksmith4424
    @patricksmith4424 21 день тому

    Feminism is now all about dominating men and has absolutely nothing to do with equality.

  • @maxrodriguez4761
    @maxrodriguez4761 22 дні тому

    Who is here from hellsing abridged

  • @RodneyAllanPoe
    @RodneyAllanPoe 22 дні тому

    It would have helped if the actors didn't fucking mumbls 90% of their dialogue. 🥴

  • @UV-NIR-Thermal
    @UV-NIR-Thermal 25 днів тому

    Thanks, the only thing I think I don't understand is Granger and why he went back, and his whole involvement.

  • @scarletbelmont9022
    @scarletbelmont9022 26 днів тому

    Thanks for mentioning that Einstein is him for a reason. I still don't get it lol

  • @harleyxxfabco
    @harleyxxfabco 27 днів тому

    The blaring question is how Jane/John didn't recognize that after her transformation into a man that she looked exactly like the man she fell in love with. That is a gigantic plot hole. And anyone could tell that "John" was a woman as soon as se came into the bar.

  • @bricktimelapsebuilds
    @bricktimelapsebuilds 27 днів тому

    Should why dont they meet when they exit the box and themother person should turn the box on in the same moment?

  • @LaLiLuLeLoX
    @LaLiLuLeLoX 27 днів тому

    Just saw the movie and was a bit of tomfoolery. I wasn't impressed. Yes it was clever the way things were revealed to the audience but it doesn't mean the story was actually any good. Of course everything was predestined with one weird gal/guy and time machine actively predestining' himself/herself due to some sort of mental injuries because of their repeated time travels. Everything else was just the director trying to "oooh" us. Unless I missed something(which I probably did); The movie was more of a loop glitch that couldve been easily fixed by just some presentation of actual facts. Meh movie

  • @noelkinz
    @noelkinz 28 днів тому

    So basically jane/john is a product of a paradoxical matrix (Meaning there is no origin of him/her existence)beating the odds they meet themselves in different parallel universes and for some fucked up reason they felt in love with each other and self reproduce Jane/john grows up wanting a purpose and mad at the world decides to become a time traveler and kill innocent people cause he/she does not give a fuck about anyone just about herself. The twist comes when john from the future decides to give john from the past a second chance to keep on living. John forgets about his past because the time traveling gives him dementia,So goes on time traveling missions trying to stop he's parallel self once again.

  • @jonasannon
    @jonasannon 28 днів тому

    i seen this like 5 times and i was still now really getting it. great film. I think timelines would split into new realities